Chance cycle Dynamics in several Spring-Piston Airguns Chap nine NEW

Brand new lessons: How to improve the recoil measurements?

I think about myself lucky if I may learn something new every day. Within preparing, writing, and talking about the previous eight chapters, I possess learned a great deal, sometimes over I wanted! One of the key points associated with discussion has been the restrictions of using a sled in order to measure air rifle recoil. The sled is practical, allowing one to easily determine different rifles, but offers two major drawbacks, certainly one of which I was aware of just before we began testing as well as the other was brought up simply by Steve in NC.
​ The very first limitation of the sled is it adds about 2 . four lbs to the recoiling gun, which will change how the uncovered rifle recoils. This is not too large a deal, especially for weightier rifles where adding a few pounds doesn’ t make very much difference, and will simply reduce the measured velocity plus acceleration. One could make the point that when an air gun is shot from the make, parts of the shooter furthermore move with the rifle, which usually adds to the recoiling mass and for that reason will help tame the recoil.
The 2nd limitation was brought up simply by Steve in NC, and contains a more pernicious impact on our own measurements. Steve aptly remarked that when the piston decelerates, halts, and starts moving backward due to the highly pressurized surroundings in front of it at the piston bounce, air rifles generally accelerate forwards at a few hundred g’ s (multiples of the acceleration of the earth’ s gravity, 9. 7 m/s2 or 32 ft/s2). To also get the sled to start moving forward, the gun has to pull the sled with hundreds of pounds associated with force, albeit for a really short amount of time. Unfortunately, the only way the particular rifle can pull the particular sled forward is with the particular Velcro strap that retains the rifle against the back again stop of the sled. Velcro is strong, but several hundred pounds of power will certainly cause it to stretch and then the sled will not instantaneously move ahead with the rifle. Since the magnets and pickup coil are usually attached to the sled plus sled base, respectively, but not directly to the rifle, we have been measuring the motion from the sled, which is not the exact same as the motion of the gun if the rifle moves on the particular sled when the Velcro extends.

Figure 9. 1 displays the original sled system. The metal plate from the rear end of the rifle (not the particular rubber buttpad) pushes towards a wooden stop at the rear of the sled, so I believe that the initial rearward acceleration from the rifle should transfer towards the sled pretty well. However , once the rifle accelerates forward this pulls the sled from it using the black Velcro band. At the piston bounce the particular forward acceleration of the atmosphere rifle is on the purchase of hundreds of g’s. Keep in mind that force equals mass moments acceleration, so to get the sled moving forward and accelerating together with the rifle, the push on the sled through the Velcro strap needs to be hundreds of periods the weight of the sled. When the sled were very gentle, it would be very easy to speed up it forward with the Velcro strap, but since the sled weighs about 2 . four lbs, it takes hundreds of lbs of force to get this to accelerate forward.

Picture

Fig. 9. one Photo of sled recoil system. The rifle can be pulled back against the back stop of the sled utilizing the Velcro strap. When the gun accelerates forward with countless gs at the piston jump, it will pull the sled forward with the Velcro secure, stretching the strap. Please be aware that in this system we have been measuring the velocity of the sled.
​ Figures 9. 2 plus 9. 3 show the newest cradle that I recently created to overcome the limitations from the sled system. The top portion of Fig. 9. 2 displays the overall setup. The gun recoils in a cradle underneath the forearm of the rifle. The particular forearm of my DO-IT-YOURSELF LGU stock is rectangle-shaped, so it’ s super easy to support it with 2 blocks of wood. The particular permanent magnet is connected directly to the rifle with a scope base on the range rail and the pickup coils is positioned using steel supports to be directly behind the particular magnet. I’ ve additional a DIY contact mic ( https://www.instructables.com/Make-a-Contact-Microphone/ ) on the recipient near the trigger. This acts two purposes. First, it offers a strong and reliable transmission to trigger the oscilloscope. The clicking of the sear when the trigger is taken, creates a sound that is acquired by the microphone and this transmission is used to let the oscilloscope know when to start getting data. The microphone furthermore provides useful insight into the proceedings inside the rifle. For example , this literally hears not only once the sear falls, but also once the piston bounces and when this lands at the front of the data compresion tube. In front of the rifle can be my DIY chronograph using its two light gates (LG1 and LG2). When the pellet passes through LG1 plus LG2, positive electrical signal are produced that are documented on the oscilloscope. The time period between these two pulses may be used to determine the pellet speed using the fact that the entrance are 1 . 88 feet apart. Once we know the pellet velocity, we can determine time it took the pellet to travel the 6” range from the muzzle to LG1. This time is subtracted in the time when the LG1 heartbeat occurs, allowing one to figure out the time when the pellet from the air rifle muzzle. Considering that we know when the sear drops using the microphone signal so when the pellet exits the particular muzzle using the light door signals, we can determine the particular pellet dwell time in our LGU, which was around eleven. 0 ms. The bottom a part of Fig. 9. 2 displays a close-up of the holder channels, which are lined along with plastic pieces that were minimize from furniture slider patches to provide low friction connection with the stock. The size of the channels is adjustable.
Picture

Fig. 9. two The overall setup using the brand new cradle system is shown on top of this figure. The pick-up coil is placed behind the particular permanent magnet, which is attached with the rifle’ s range rail using an aluminum pole and a modified scope bottom. A DIY contact mic is mounted on the recipient near the trigger. In front of the gun is my DIY chronograph with its two light entrance, LG1 and LG2, that are used to measure the pellet leave time. The rifle 35mm slides in the two cradle facilitates. A close-up photo from the cradle supports is proven in the bottom of the body.
Figure 9. 3 displays a close-up of the recoil measurement system. The long lasting rare-earth magnet is adhered to the end of an light weight aluminum rod, which is screwed right into a modified scope base which is attached to the rifle’ ersus scope rail. The system effortlessly can withstand over a 100 pounds of force but still remain securely attached to the particular rifle. Of course , since the mixed mass of the scope bottom, aluminum rod, and magnets is only 30. 0 grms, only about 13. 5 lbs of force are required to speed up them in unison with the remaining rifle, even if the rifles increases with 2000 m/s2 (over 200 gs! ). The particular pickup coil is fixed and is positioned directly at the rear of the permanent magnet. We used rods and clamps to allow the position and alignment of the pickup coil to become securely and easily transformed, which will help when different guns are placed in the cradle.
Picture

Fig. 9. a few A close-up photo from the velocity measurement system for your new cradle setup. The particular pickup coil is placed at the rear of the permanent magnet, that is attached to the rifle’ h scope rail using an aluminium rod and a modified range base.
Figure 9. four shows the old and brand new recoil traces. On the still left, one can see the recoil which was measured with the old sled system. The red search for in the middle shows the sled velocity as a function of your time. The orange trace correct below it shows the sunshine gate signal, with the reddish colored vertical lines indicating once the pellet exited the snout. The top graph shows the positioning of the sled vs . period and the bottom graph displays the acceleration vs . period. The right part of Fig. nine. 4 shows the recoil traces that were obtained utilizing the new cradle system. Besides the position, velocity, and speed of the rifle itself, Also i plot the contact mic signal at the top. The mic signal shows a large preliminary pulse (trigger sear noise), then a smaller pulse (piston bounce, PB), and then 2 large pulses (piston getting at the front of the compression pipe for the first time PL1, bouncing as well as then landing again PL2). We can learn a lot whenever we just listen!
Picture

Fig. 9. 4 Recoil traces using the sled upon left, and the new holder setup on the right. Along with recording the velocity of the sled or rifle, from which placement and acceleration are driven, we also record the sunshine gate signal to determine once the pellet exits the snout. With the new cradle program, I also simultaneously recorded the particular signal from the contact mic, which is plotted at the top of the best column. The microphone enables one to “ hear” the particular sear breaking, the piston bounce (PB), and the very first and second piston landings (PL1 and PL2).
The velocity plus position traces are qualitatively and even quantitatively similar utilizing the two measurement systems. Using the sled system, the position track is much more rounded, smoother as well as the dips are shifted in order to longer times. Also, the particular sled goes back 4. five mm before stopping whilst with the cradle system the particular rifle goes back 4. 0mm. Another difference is that the sled goes forward a much better distance after the first cease compared to the rifle in the holder. The sled almost will get halfway back to its beginning position, while the cradled gun moves forward less than a millimeter after the initial stop. More suitable movement of the sled is most likely due to the lower friction within moving the sled in comparison to moving the rifle within the cradle. The smoother, rounder, and delayed dips are usually due to slop in the link of the rifle to the sled via the Velcro strap, since will be discussed below.
The red speed traces in the middle of Fig. nine. 4 also are similar, having an initial dip as the gun and sled recoil in reverse, a forward peak because the rifle and sled move ahead, and some oscillations after that. The utmost rearward velocity of the sled is around 750 mm/s, that is similar to the value obtained utilizing the cradle. This is probably because of the strong connection of the gun to the sled when the gun is pushing back. However, the first dip in the speed with the sled is symmetrical while the right side of this same dip is much higher with the cradle system (see purple ovals in Fig. 9. 4). Furthermore, the particular magnitude of the peak forwards velocity using the sled strategy is about a element of two bigger than with the holder system! The most critical distinction is that the pellet exit time with the sled occurs before the sled halts (v=0), although it occurs following the rifle stops using the holder system . The reason for this really is that with the sled, the particular rifle stops and begins moving forward well before the sled gets accelerated forward with the stretched Velcro strap. Because of this, the sled stops following the rifle stops, so the absolutely no in the sled velocity happens later, after the pellet offers exited the muzzle. The particular pellet actually exited the particular muzzle after the rifle halted, but since we’ re calculating the motion of the sled and not the rifle, we all do not measure this properly. This is probably the biggest issue with using the sled. The extra advance of the sled could be because of the stretched Velcro causing the sled to snap forward plus hit the back of the gun, giving the system a delayed, additional push forward. The lower rubbing of the sled could also permit the amplitudes of the position plus velocity oscillations to be larger compared to the rifle sliding with additional friction on the cradle.
The bottom traces within Fig. 9. 4 display the acceleration of the sled (left) and the rifle within the cradle (right). Here right after are most dramatic. The particular slop in the connection between rifle and the sled, specially when the rifle is going forwards and relies on the Velcro strap to pull the sled forward, results in broader highs and dips with smaller magnitudes. The particular peak forward acceleration in the piston bounce with the sled is around 200 m/s2 whilst it’ s closer to truck m/s2 with the cradle! Thanks to the new holder data, we can see that the piston landing is more violent (louder and bigger acceleration) compared to piston bounce. I guess the cushion of compressed air flow is gentler in ending the piston than the metal end of the compression pipe! It’s nice to gauge the sound in addition to the velocity plus pellet exit signals.
The problems with the sled system will corrupt the particular recoil traces, especially the particular acceleration. However , since we all use the same sled program to characterize and evaluate all three air guns, the relative differences in recoil behavior can still provide regarding their behavior. Ideally, we might use the new cradle program for all these measurements, yet that will have to be a future task.
Although I actually strive to learn from other people’ s mistakes, I usually learn more from my errors than from my achievements, and this mistake has been quite educational! My understanding of exactly how an air rifle recoils and how to measure it (and not measure it) offers dramatically improved thanks the particular revelations that Steve produced!  

Findings: What does all this means?

This course of chapters has been a lengthy journey for me, that is nevertheless ongoing. I have learned a good deal, but still have a lot to understand. I have drawn four simple conclusions from this work:

1 . Airguns are intriguing! You probably wouldn’ t have made it with the last eight chapters in case you didn’ t agree with this particular, but I have gained a much greater appreciation for the engineering plus physics involved in air weapons. I’ m still surprised that a bouncy mechanical program can put 10 pellets within a quarter inch of every other at 20 back yards. The spread of pellet impacts corresponds to an slanted separation of less than zero. 02 degrees. That’ t an angular resolution of just one part in 18, 1000! Even more remarkable is the fact that our forty year old FWB 124, with its break barrel, complements the accuracy of modern underlever air rifles, built in this particular century! For a break barrel or clip to achieve this kind of accuracy, the particular muzzle of the barrel must repeatably return to the same place within 0. 006” once the barrel is closed. Which is done with a simple basketball detent to lock the particular barrel in place. I wouldn’ t be surprised in case most barrels have a runout from one end to the some other that is at least a few thousandths of an inch. This precision is achieved in spite of pretty violent recoil motion, with all the rifle moving almost the centimeter back before the pellet leaves the barrel within the artillery hold. Figure nine. 1 shows some of the best 10-shot groups that I have actually shot from a springer on 20 yards. In Fig. 9. 2 you can see exactly how my LGU did with 52 yards. The organizations all have a similar POI, especially the first and 3rd groups, which are right on best of each other. These organizations would be pretty respectable to get a 22 rimfire rifle, therefore I’ m very happy and also a bit surprised by the functionality of my LGU with 52 yards.

Picture

Fig. nine. 5 Eight 10-shot groupings from my LGU from the bench at 20 back yards. The composite group around the right overlays all the groupings on top of each other using the striving square and demonstrates that most eighty shots landed within a circle with a diameter associated with 0. 60”. The ctc distance for the 80-shot team was a 0. 45”.
Picture

Fig. 9. 6 Even more recent groups from the LGU off the bench on 52 yards. These are 10-shot groups, with ctc ranges of 0. 72”, zero. 89”, and 0. 62”.
2 . Don’ t rely on a single target group! The computer simulations and much more extensive target testing offers convinced me that one are unable to judge the accuracy of the rifle based on a single team. Completely random fluctuations can simply produce tiny groups, particularly if the group consists of five pictures, but also for 10-shot groups. Also i learned that my simple suggestions of statistics do not apply at groups at a target. The girls size does not grow just as the square root of the amount of shots, as one would anticipate for a normal distribution. Within hindsight, this makes full sense since all guns have a point of influence envelope (POIE) in which they could pretty much keep all their pictures, so we should not expect team sizes to simply grow with no limit as the number of photos in the group increases.
Figure 9. 3a) shows four 10-shot groupings at 20 yards through my LGU. The first 3 groups are pretty normal, but the last had a ctc of around 0. 090”. This is pretty remarkable, yet unfortunately does not reflect the things i can normally expect from this rifle. If we can get an amazingly small group for 10-shot groups, mostly by accident, the chance for getting a tiny but non-representative 5-shot group is increased. Figure 9. 3b) displays largest and smallest five-shot groups out of a total associated with twenty groups that were created completely randomly on a pc. One can pretty easily obtain a difference of nearly an issue of two in team sizes for purely randomly groups, so when I obtain a super tiny five-shot team, I have to wonder if it may just luck.
Picture

Fig. 9. seven a) A tiny group and several more typical groups through the same rifle under similar conditions. b) A big as well as a tiny group randomly created by a computer under similar conditions. My LGU provides produced groups as small as zero. 090” at 20 back yards, but I’ m scared that this isn’ t common. If I create 5-shot organizations on a computer, there’ t a pretty good chance a single group ends up being fifty percent the size of another group.
3 . Physics and math allow us to see what is normally invisible! It’ s enjoyable to tinker with plus shoot air rifles, yet it’ s even more fascinating and interesting to try to realize their behavior in more fine detail. The recoil of these guns is complex. I found this especially exciting that several basic analysis of the general recoil of the rifle provided us important quantitative details about what the piston, which is concealed inside the receiver tube, does. We can estimate the piston speed as a function of your time. If we had better information and analysis on what the particular mainspring is doing we could actually obtain the piston position being a function of time. This in turn can provide us the pressure plus temperature of the air within the compression chamber on a sub-millisecond time scale. I also found that the pellet leaves the particular barrel in about ten milliseconds, right when the piston is making an immediate stop near the front from the compression chamber. Although all of us like to have smooth, hype free spring piston surroundings rifles, the strong recoil oscillations after the pellet simply leaves the barrel do not impact accuracy, so maybe we all shouldn’ t worry about all of them as much? I also hope these chapters help remove a few of the stigma associated with tools that will shoot projectiles! My family and am spent a year in Munich Germany a few years ago plus my son’ s choir group went on a field visit to an airgun club in order to shoot airguns at ten meters. It would be hard to picture something like this happening in the united states! One of the senior choir educators was an avid air gun competitor and she made it apparent that the airguns in the girl club were not weapons yet were really sports apparatus. There are quite a few Olympic sports activities such as the biathlon, archery, secure fencing, and of course target shooting which have martial origins, but now are usually highly competitive and challenging athletic endeavors. Airguns are widely used for hunting. Naturally , airguns can be dangerous, nevertheless they are handled responsibly, they could be extremely beneficial, and can maybe even be used to learn (and value! ) physics and anatomist!

Figure 9. four shows the position, velocity, plus acceleration of an air gun as a function of time. Additionally, it shows when the pellet still left the barrel. There’ s i9000 a lot of complex and fascinating information here, but the problem is to figure out what it every means!
Picture

Fig. 9. 8 By calculating the velocity of the recoiling gun as a function of time utilizing a pick up coil, one can “ see” how the rifle techniques when it is fired. Using the brand new cradle system, I assessed velocity of the rifle within the center plot, and using calculus was able to determine the position (top plot) and acceleration (bottom plot) of the rifle since functions of time with sub-millisecond time resolution. I also report the light gate signal to find out when the pellet exits the particular muzzle. Using the contact mic signal (plotted at the top), one can also “ hear” the sear breaking, the particular piston bounce (PB), as well as the first and second piston landings (PL1 and PL2).
4. It’ s the individuals! I’ meters glad that I wasn’ capital t alone on this journey associated with exploring air rifles, and fact if it weren’ big t for my fellow air flow rifle shooters whom I’ ve befriended over the years, I’ m sure that these chapters would never have been written! I needed a lot of fun working with Hector plus Yogi on these chapters over the past nine months (seems like an appropriate gestation period! ) and really appreciate their own help in making sense of it every.

I have greatly enjoyed plus benefitted from talking along with fellow airgunners from across the world. A great example was our experience at my first Pyramyd Cup in 2019 (see Fig. 9. 5). I used to be having some technical issues with new equipment and at the conclusion of the first day associated with competition, many of the people that I used to be competing against spent their own limited free time to help myself. Several of these people were national plus international champions in FEET, so it was wonderful (albeit a bit embarrassing! ) to possess a group of FT veterans dealing with me to get the technical difficulties sorted out before the fit continued on the second day time.  

Picture

Fig. 9. nine Photo of Nathan, Hector, and me at the Pyramyd Cup in 2019.
I hope you have found these chapters fascinating and that they stimulate more conversations and new friendships!

JC
Aug/2021

Reset Password
Compare items
  • Total (0)
Compare
0